Balancing acts - wielding the balance of power
By: KERNOT, Cheryl
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Oxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, June 1997Australian Journal of Public Administration 56, 2, p. 32-39Abstract: After discussing the nature of the balance of power following the March 1996 federal election, this article looks at potential methods of influence for parties (particularly the Australian Democrats) in a balance of power situation. Included are three case studes of major legislation. The results show levels of influence to be mixed depending on the nature of the legislation. The results show levels of influence to be mixed depending on the nature of the legislation, and the Howard government to be a 'mixed bag' in its approa to parliamentary process and dealing with the Senate. The final stage of this article looks briefly across those case studies to make conclusions as to the motivation, intent and consequences of public sector changes which are occurring under the Howard government
After discussing the nature of the balance of power following the March 1996 federal election, this article looks at potential methods of influence for parties (particularly the Australian Democrats) in a balance of power situation. Included are three case studes of major legislation. The results show levels of influence to be mixed depending on the nature of the legislation. The results show levels of influence to be mixed depending on the nature of the legislation, and the Howard government to be a 'mixed bag' in its approa to parliamentary process and dealing with the Senate. The final stage of this article looks briefly across those case studies to make conclusions as to the motivation, intent and consequences of public sector changes which are occurring under the Howard government
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.