Competition, productivity and the cult of 'more is good' in the Australian health care sector
By: BRAITHWAITE, Jeffrey
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Oxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, March 1997Australian Journal of Public Administration 56, 1, p. 37-44Abstract: Economic policy discussions emphasise growth, the maximisation of output, efficiency and the pursuit of rational self-interest. Many policy-makers, bureaucracts and managers in health care have been influenced by economists who believe that competition and the marketplace will provide maximum output and efficiency. Thus, for some, helath care involves treating more and more patients for the same money. They argue for strategies such as reducing waste, lowering costs, increasing inpatient throughput and introducing competition between providers, especially hospitals, in order to simulate productivity to achieve their aim. Yet in health care more is not necessarily good. Embracing the culture of the marketplace in a predominantly publicly funded system runs the risk of failing to distribute health care services equitably, and leads to more inappropriate and unnecessary care. An approach that merely strives to treat more patients and lower costs should be rejected in favour of a health system that values effectiveness, health outcomes, quality and the public good, and is patient-centred not delivery system-centred
Economic policy discussions emphasise growth, the maximisation of output, efficiency and the pursuit of rational self-interest. Many policy-makers, bureaucracts and managers in health care have been influenced by economists who believe that competition and the marketplace will provide maximum output and efficiency. Thus, for some, helath care involves treating more and more patients for the same money. They argue for strategies such as reducing waste, lowering costs, increasing inpatient throughput and introducing competition between providers, especially hospitals, in order to simulate productivity to achieve their aim. Yet in health care more is not necessarily good. Embracing the culture of the marketplace in a predominantly publicly funded system runs the risk of failing to distribute health care services equitably, and leads to more inappropriate and unnecessary care. An approach that merely strives to treat more patients and lower costs should be rejected in favour of a health system that values effectiveness, health outcomes, quality and the public good, and is patient-centred not delivery system-centred
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.