A talent for bereaucracy' : A.F. Davies and the analysis of government in Australia
By: COLEBATCH, Hal
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Oxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, December 2005Australian Journal of Public Administration 64, 4, p. 32-40Abstract: In an address in 2003, Senator Kim Carr cited A.F. Davies' much-quoted observation that Australians have 'a characteristic talent for bureaucracy' (Carr 2003: 3). He referred to the achievements of bureaucrats like Nugget Coombs, then went on to discuss questions of accountability, values and political control in the Australian public service. How could the public service be responsive and responsible, and contribute to the maintenance of a democratic society, in today's world? Certainly, these were core concerns of Davies, as Walter argues in an insightful article (1999). Davies, Walter argues, 'was concerned, throughout his career, with the links between bureaucracy and democracy' (1999, 25), fearful that the life-world is increasingly being structured by expertise, and in the domain of the experts, there is little room for individual voice, for passion, or for democratic control. Davies' concerns, and those of Carr and Walter, raise important questions about the way in which we understand the structure of government, the significance of our changing understanding for the democratic ideal, and the implications of these changes for social scientists
In an address in 2003, Senator Kim Carr cited A.F. Davies' much-quoted observation that Australians have 'a characteristic talent for bureaucracy' (Carr 2003: 3). He referred to the achievements of bureaucrats like Nugget Coombs, then went on to discuss questions of accountability, values and political control in the Australian public service. How could the public service be responsive and responsible, and contribute to the maintenance of a democratic society, in today's world? Certainly, these were core concerns of Davies, as Walter argues in an insightful article (1999). Davies, Walter argues, 'was concerned, throughout his career, with the links between bureaucracy and democracy' (1999, 25), fearful that the life-world is increasingly being structured by expertise, and in the domain of the experts, there is little room for individual voice, for passion, or for democratic control. Davies' concerns, and those of Carr and Walter, raise important questions about the way in which we understand the structure of government, the significance of our changing understanding for the democratic ideal, and the implications of these changes for social scientists
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.