<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Judicial review and policy making in Hong Kong :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Judicial review and policy making in Hong Kong :

By: CHEUNG, Anthony B. L.
Contributor(s): WONG, Max W. L.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Hong Kong : Departament of Politics and Public Administration of Hong Kong, December 2006The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 28, 2, p. 117-141Abstract: The number of judicial review challenges in Hong Kong has grow rapidly in recent years, following Hong Kong's reversion to Chinese sovereignty. Judicial review has also become an alternative means to initiate and back up political bargaining, and even to extend the political arena foragenda-setting. This article examines the role and implications of judicial review from public administration and policymaking perspectives, focusing on the two critical issues of "the politicisation of the judiciary" and "the judicialisation of politics and public policy". It finds that the courts have been trying not to involve political arguments in judicial review. Their adjudication is still based on the legality issues rather than various political preferences, with most rulings essentially maintaining the status quo or government position
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

The number of judicial review challenges in Hong Kong has grow rapidly in recent years, following Hong Kong's reversion to Chinese sovereignty. Judicial review has also become an alternative means to initiate and back up political bargaining, and even to extend the political arena foragenda-setting. This article examines the role and implications of judicial review from public administration and policymaking perspectives, focusing on the two critical issues of "the politicisation of the judiciary" and "the judicialisation of politics and public policy". It finds that the courts have been trying not to involve political arguments in judicial review. Their adjudication is still based on the legality issues rather than various political preferences, with most rulings essentially maintaining the status quo or government position

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha