<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Texa de juror, preferência pela liquidez e fundos de empréstimo :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Texa de juror, preferência pela liquidez e fundos de empréstimo : uma análise crítica das tentativas de demonstração da equivalência entre a teorias dos fundos de empréstimos e de preferência pela liquidez

By: OREIRO, José Luiz.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: São Paulo : Editora 34, abr./jun. 2001Revista de Economia Política = Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 21, 2 , p. 117-133Abstract: This article presents the atempts to demonstrate the equivalence between loanable funds and liquidity preference theories of interest rate done by Hicks, Lerner, Tsiang and Patinkin in order to show that these attempts were not suceed. That is so because these atempts had started from wrong conceptions about what are the issues under discussion in the debate between loanable funds and liquidity preference theories or because they had misrepresented one or another of both theories. In fact, the atempts done by Hicks and Patinkin desconsider the fact that what is essential in this debate was the mechanism by which saving and investment decisions have influence in the determination of interest rate. By the other side, the atempts of Lerner and Tsiang misrepresent the relation between saving and investment and the finance motive of demand for money that is supposed by both theories
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

This article presents the atempts to demonstrate the equivalence between loanable funds and liquidity preference theories of interest rate done by Hicks, Lerner, Tsiang and Patinkin in order to show that these attempts were not suceed. That is so because these atempts had started from wrong conceptions about what are the issues under discussion in the debate between loanable funds and liquidity preference theories or because they had misrepresented one or another of both theories. In fact, the atempts done by Hicks and Patinkin desconsider the fact that what is essential in this debate was the mechanism by which saving and investment decisions have influence in the determination of interest rate. By the other side, the atempts of Lerner and Tsiang misrepresent the relation between saving and investment and the finance motive of demand for money that is supposed by both theories

Revista de Economia Política 2001

v. 21, n. 2(82)

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha