Can institutions build unity in multiethnic states?
By: ELKINS, Zachary
.
Contributor(s): SIDES, John.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: New York : Cambridge University Press, November 2007American Political Science Review 101, 4, p. 693-708Abstract: We investigate whether political institutions can promote attachment to the state in multiethnic societies. Building on literatures on nationalism, democratization, and conflict resolution, we discuss the importance of attachment, understood as a psychological identification with, and pride in, the state. We construct a model of state attachment, specifying the individual-, group-, and state-level conditions that foster it. Then, using cross-national survey data from 51 multiethnic states, we show that, in general, ethnic minorities manifest less attachment to the states in which they reside than do majorities. Combining the survey data with minority group attributes and country-level attributes, we show that the attachment of minorities varies importantly across groups and countries. Our central finding is that federalism and proportional electoral systemstwo highly touted solutions to ethnic divisionshave at best mixed effects. These results have implications for state-building and democratic consolidation in ethnically heterogeneous states
We investigate whether political institutions can promote attachment to the state in multiethnic societies. Building on literatures on nationalism, democratization, and conflict resolution, we discuss the importance of attachment, understood as a psychological identification with, and pride in, the state. We construct a model of state attachment, specifying the individual-, group-, and state-level conditions that foster it. Then, using cross-national survey data from 51 multiethnic states, we show that, in general, ethnic minorities manifest less attachment to the states in which they reside than do majorities. Combining the survey data with minority group attributes and country-level attributes, we show that the attachment of minorities varies importantly across groups and countries. Our central finding is that federalism and proportional electoral systemstwo highly touted solutions to ethnic divisionshave at best mixed effects. These results have implications for state-building and democratic consolidation in ethnically heterogeneous states
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.