Accountability in a performance appraisal context : the effect of audience and form of accounting on rater response and behavior
By: MERO, Neal P
.
Contributor(s): GUIDICE, Rebecca M | BROWNLEE, Amy L.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: London, UK : Sage Publications, April 2007Journal of Management : J.O.M 33, 2, p. 223-252Abstract: This study explored how context influences accountability in a performance appraisal context. Results demonstrate that audience characteristics influence rating quality, as raters accountable to higher status or mixed-status audiences provided more accurate ratings, whereas those accountable to a lower status audience provided more inflated ratings. Participant note taking also mediated the relationship between accountability to higher status or mixed-status audiences and rating accuracy. Raters required to account for ratings in person as opposed to in writing were more accurate when accountable to higher status or mixed audiences and provided more positive indicators of behavior when accountable to a lower status audience
This study explored how context influences accountability in a performance appraisal context. Results demonstrate that audience characteristics influence rating quality, as raters accountable to higher status or mixed-status audiences provided more accurate ratings, whereas those accountable to a lower status audience provided more inflated ratings. Participant note taking also mediated the relationship between accountability to higher status or mixed-status audiences and rating accuracy. Raters required to account for ratings in person as opposed to in writing were more accurate when accountable to higher status or mixed audiences and provided more positive indicators of behavior when accountable to a lower status audience
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.