<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Deliberative democracy and the institutions of judicial review
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Deliberative democracy and the institutions of judicial review

By: ZURN, Christopher F.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: New York : Cambridge University , 2007Description: 366 p.ISBN: 9780521867344.Subject(s): Democracia | Direito Constitucional | Agência Reguladora | Estados Unidos
Contents:
1. Introduction A. An old chestnut is actually two B. Pathologies of ad hoc triangulation C. Functions and institutions 2. Majoritarian democracy and minoritarian constitutionalism A. Judicial review as substantially legitimate protection of minority rights B. Judicial review as procedurelly legitimate protection of democracy C. Moving beyond aggregative majoritarianism and minoritarian constitutionalism 3. From majoritarian to deliberative theories of constitutional democracy A. Deliberative democracy: Four axes of analysis B. Constitutionalism: Four central elements C. Constitutional democracy? 4. Deliberative democracy and substantive constitutionalism A. Keepers of the substantive flame of American exceptionalism B. Guardians of the moral law in the forum of principle C. Are substantialist defenses of judicial review self-defeating? 5. Disagreement and the constitution of democracy A. Democratic precommitment to judicial review: Freeman B. Deliberative majoritarianism and the paternalism of judicial review: Waldron C. Upshot: We need a theory of democratic constitutionalism 6. The seducements of juristic discourse as democratic deliberation A. A division of labor between juristic deliberation and populist aggregation? B. Actual juristic discourse in the United States system of constitutional adjudication C. Legal principles and moral-political reasoning 7. Constitutionalism as the procedural structuring of deliberative democracy A. A provisional summary: Criteria for an adequate theory of constitutional review B. Guardians of the conditions of procedural legitimacy: Habermas 8. The institutions of constitutional review i: Design problems and judicial review A. The problems of designing institutions of constitutional review B. Independent constitutional courts in a concentrated review system 9. The institutions of constitutional review II: horizontal dispersal and vertical empowerment A. Self-review panels in the legislature and regulatory agencies B. Mechanisms for interbranch debate and decisional dispersal C. Easing formal amendability requirements D. Establishing civic constitutional fora
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Livro Geral Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
Livro Geral 4.08Z967d (Browse shelf) 1 Available 10012087

1. Introduction A. An old chestnut is actually two B. Pathologies of ad hoc triangulation C. Functions and institutions 2. Majoritarian democracy and minoritarian constitutionalism A. Judicial review as substantially legitimate protection of minority rights B. Judicial review as procedurelly legitimate protection of democracy C. Moving beyond aggregative majoritarianism and minoritarian constitutionalism 3. From majoritarian to deliberative theories of constitutional democracy A. Deliberative democracy: Four axes of analysis B. Constitutionalism: Four central elements C. Constitutional democracy? 4. Deliberative democracy and substantive constitutionalism A. Keepers of the substantive flame of American exceptionalism B. Guardians of the moral law in the forum of principle C. Are substantialist defenses of judicial review self-defeating? 5. Disagreement and the constitution of democracy A. Democratic precommitment to judicial review: Freeman B. Deliberative majoritarianism and the paternalism of judicial review: Waldron C. Upshot: We need a theory of democratic constitutionalism 6. The seducements of juristic discourse as democratic deliberation A. A division of labor between juristic deliberation and populist aggregation? B. Actual juristic discourse in the United States system of constitutional adjudication C. Legal principles and moral-political reasoning 7. Constitutionalism as the procedural structuring of deliberative democracy A. A provisional summary: Criteria for an adequate theory of constitutional review B. Guardians of the conditions of procedural legitimacy: Habermas 8. The institutions of constitutional review i: Design problems and judicial review A. The problems of designing institutions of constitutional review B. Independent constitutional courts in a concentrated review system 9. The institutions of constitutional review II: horizontal dispersal and vertical empowerment A. Self-review panels in the legislature and regulatory agencies B. Mechanisms for interbranch debate and decisional dispersal C. Easing formal amendability requirements D. Establishing civic constitutional fora

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha