<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: The rise and fall of interagency cooperation :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The rise and fall of interagency cooperation : the U.S. global change research program

By: LAMBRIGHT, W. Henry.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, jan./feb.1997Public administration review: PAR 57, 1, p. 36-44Abstract: Harold Seidman has called interagency commitees " the crabgrass in the garden of extirpate them seldom succeed, for new committees grow in their place. This is because altenatives generally are worse, and there is a compelling need to coordinate programs that sprawl across many agencies. An example of an interagency committee that "worked," at least for a period, is the committee on environment and natural resources, charged with coordinating the multibillion dollar global change research program. Born under reagen, the committee rose to prominence under bush, being cited as an exemplary model for other interagency programs. Under Clinton, it was used as a prototype again, even as it declined in influence. The evolution of the committee illuminates the key factors that strengthen and weaken interagency coopeation in government.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Harold Seidman has called interagency commitees " the crabgrass in the garden of extirpate them seldom succeed, for new committees grow in their place. This is because altenatives generally are worse, and there is a compelling need to coordinate programs that sprawl across many agencies. An example of an interagency committee that "worked," at least for a period, is the committee on environment and natural resources, charged with coordinating the multibillion dollar global change research program. Born under reagen, the committee rose to prominence under bush, being cited as an exemplary model for other interagency programs. Under Clinton, it was used as a prototype again, even as it declined in influence. The evolution of the committee illuminates the key factors that strengthen and weaken interagency coopeation in government.

Public administration review PAR

Jan./Feb. 1997 Volume 57 Number 1

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha