The lien item veto act(P.L.104-130), which took effect on january 1, 1997, could have profund effects on the relationship between congress and the president in the budget process. Rather than providing constitutional item-veto authority similar to that enjoyed by governors, this version of the item veto is an esoansion of the president's authority to rescind appropriated funds, first created by the congressional budget and impoudement control act of 1974. Under P.L. 104-130, the president's proposed cancellations of discretionary budget authority, new direct spending, and targeted tax benefits will take effects unless specifically disapproved by congress. As enacted, the line-item veto will have effects that are far less dramatic than most of its supportes or detractors have suggested. It is likely to have little effect on overall spending and deficits. It could increase the president's ability to persuade suport. The structure of the line item veto act may allow the congress, however, to circumscribe the president's power by changing the way that legislation is packaged or by writing specific language into legislation that restricts its use. Scholars should examine and evaluate these and other effects of P.L. 104-130 because the law sunsets on january 1, 2005, thus forcing a decision concerning whether the president should continue to have this authority and in what form.

Public administration review PAR

Mar./Apr. 1997 Volume 57 Number 2