<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: The structure of bureaucratic decisions in the American state
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The structure of bureaucratic decisions in the American state

By: SCHNEIDER, Saundra K.
Contributor(s): JACOBY, William G | COGGBURN, Jerrell D.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, may/june 1997Public administration review: PAR 57, 3, p. 240-249Abstract: This paper examines the structure of bureaucratic decisions in state medicaid programs. More specifically, the analysis tries to discern an underlying pattern in medicaid optional service adoptions across the american states during the period from 1985 through 1994. These adoptions result from state-level administrative initiatives rather than federal or state legislative actions. The analysis shows that states differ in the extent to which they extend services into more controversial aspects of health care. And their willingness to do sollows a clear cumulative pattern: states initiate more controversial, limited services only after they have already adopted a full range of services that are widely acceptable to the public and governmental officials. This cumulative pattern in administrative decisions reveals a great deal about the nature of bureaucratic actions in state-level social welfare programs. This study also produces an emprirical measure of bureaucratic policy outputs that can be used as an analytic variable in other research efforts.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

This paper examines the structure of bureaucratic decisions in state medicaid programs. More specifically, the analysis tries to discern an underlying pattern in medicaid optional service adoptions across the american states during the period from 1985 through 1994. These adoptions result from state-level administrative initiatives rather than federal or state legislative actions. The analysis shows that states differ in the extent to which they extend services into more controversial aspects of health care. And their willingness to do sollows a clear cumulative pattern: states initiate more controversial, limited services only after they have already adopted a full range of services that are widely acceptable to the public and governmental officials. This cumulative pattern in administrative decisions reveals a great deal about the nature of bureaucratic actions in state-level social welfare programs. This study also produces an emprirical measure of bureaucratic policy outputs that can be used as an analytic variable in other research efforts.

Public administration review PAR

May/June 1997 Volume 57 Number 3

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha