Measuring policy learning : regulatory impact assessment in Europe
By: RADAELLI, Claudio M
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Oxfordshire : Rouledge, December 2009Journal of European Public Policy 16, 8, p. 1145-1164Abstract: Do analytic approaches to policy appraisal, specifically regulatory impact assessment (RIA), enable complex organizations to learn? To answer this question, this article distinguishes between types of learning (instrumental, legitimacy-seeking emulation, and political), spells out their micro-foundations, and formulates expectations about evidence drawing on the literature on knowledge utilization. Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK and the EU corroborate emulation and to some extend political learning rather than instrumental learning. The conclusions explain why some types of learning prevail over other.
Do analytic approaches to policy appraisal, specifically regulatory impact assessment (RIA), enable complex organizations to learn? To answer this question, this article distinguishes between types of learning (instrumental, legitimacy-seeking emulation, and political), spells out their micro-foundations, and formulates expectations about evidence drawing on the literature on knowledge utilization. Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK and the EU corroborate emulation and to some extend political learning rather than instrumental learning. The conclusions explain why some types of learning prevail over other.
knowledge utilization; policy appraisal; policy learning; regulation; regulatory impact assessment.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.