The unassailable principle : why luther gulick searched for a science of administration
By: ROBERTS, Alasdair
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: New York : Marcel Dekker, 1998International Journal of Public Administration - IJPA 21, 2-4, p. 235-274Abstract: Luther Gulick's two contributions to the Papers on the Science of Administration are often regarded as a statement of the orthodoxy in the field of public administration in the pre-war period. This paper challenges this view. It argues that the two basic claims in Gulick's work--the notion that public administration could be considered as a science, and that field could be studied without regard to politics--were widely contested throughout the 1920's and 1930's. Gulick adhered to these claims in part because they were useful in protecting a young and weakly-institutionalized field against powerful critics. By the late 1930's, academics in public administration may have confronted a dilemma: the position staked out by Gulick and others, while essential to the development of the field, was regarded by many within the field as being intellectually untenable.
Luther Gulick's two contributions to the Papers on the Science of Administration are often regarded as a statement of the orthodoxy in the field of public administration in the pre-war period. This paper challenges this view. It argues that the two basic claims in Gulick's work--the notion that public administration could be considered as a science, and that field could be studied without regard to politics--were widely contested throughout the 1920's and 1930's. Gulick adhered to these claims in part because they were useful in protecting a young and weakly-institutionalized field against powerful critics. By the late 1930's, academics in public administration may have confronted a dilemma: the position staked out by Gulick and others, while essential to the development of the field, was regarded by many within the field as being intellectually untenable.
Volume 21
Numbers 2-4
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.