<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: An ethical defense of regulatory forbearance
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

An ethical defense of regulatory forbearance

By: WOLLER, Gary.
Contributor(s): BRADY, F. Neil.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: New York : Marcel Dekker, 1995International Journal of Public Administration - IJPA 18, 5, p. 851-877Abstract: Forbearance is one of the principal tools of regulatory enforcement. To regulatory critics, forbearance is reflective of venal, lazy, or weak regulators more interested in pursuing private gains than the public interest. To enforcement officials, however, such views reflect unrealistic images of regulated firms and the regulatory environment. Rather, they see forbearance as a rational and ethical response to the complexities of economic and social regulation. The ethical justification for forbearance is rooted in utilitarian moral philosophy, in which forbearance is seen as the most effective way to promote the social purposes of regulation. Nonetheless, individual acts of forbearance may fail to fulfill utilitarian ethical standards. This occurs when forbearance becomes a routinized application of organizational or extra-organizational norms, instead of a case-by-case strategy of regulatory enforcement.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Forbearance is one of the principal tools of regulatory enforcement. To regulatory critics, forbearance is reflective of venal, lazy, or weak regulators more interested in pursuing private gains than the public interest. To enforcement officials, however, such views reflect unrealistic images of regulated firms and the regulatory environment. Rather, they see forbearance as a rational and ethical response to the complexities of economic and social regulation. The ethical justification for forbearance is rooted in utilitarian moral philosophy, in which forbearance is seen as the most effective way to promote the social purposes of regulation. Nonetheless, individual acts of forbearance may fail to fulfill utilitarian ethical standards. This occurs when forbearance becomes a routinized application of organizational or extra-organizational norms, instead of a case-by-case strategy of regulatory enforcement.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha