<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: The European Union's governance ambitions and its administrative capacities
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The European Union's governance ambitions and its administrative capacities

By: SCHOUT, Adriaan.
Contributor(s): JORDAN, Andrew.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Oxfordshire, UK : Routledge, October 2008Journal of European Public Policy 15, 7, p. 957-974Abstract: The existing literature has started to analyse why the policy coordination ambitions that permated the 2001 White Paper on governance have not been realized. However, surprisingly little attention has been devoted to exploring actors. This article opens up this research area by focusing on more ambitious policy objectives and their associated network-based modes of governance. The empirical part examines three public administration systems in the EU to assess how well they have responded to these demands. Although often downplayed by those advocating network-based modes of governance, this paper reveals that the administrative demands they pose are much greater than is commonly supposed. Some actors (e.g. the Commission and the UK) have upgreaded their administrative co-ordinating capacities, whereas others (e.g. the Netherlands) have moved in a perverse direction. It is concluded that the EU needs to take administrative capacity building much more seriousily in order to govern in a less hierarchial manner.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

The existing literature has started to analyse why the policy coordination ambitions that permated the 2001 White Paper on governance have not been realized. However, surprisingly little attention has been devoted to exploring actors. This article opens up this research area by focusing on more ambitious policy objectives and their associated network-based modes of governance. The empirical part examines three public administration systems in the EU to assess how well they have responded to these demands. Although often downplayed by those advocating network-based modes of governance, this paper reveals that the administrative demands they pose are much greater than is commonly supposed. Some actors (e.g. the Commission and the UK) have upgreaded their administrative co-ordinating capacities, whereas others (e.g. the Netherlands) have moved in a perverse direction. It is concluded that the EU needs to take administrative capacity building much more seriousily in order to govern in a less hierarchial manner.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha