<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Trapped in the supranational-intergovernmental dichotomy :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Trapped in the supranational-intergovernmental dichotomy : a response to Stone Sweet and Sandholtz

By: BRANCH, Ann P.
Contributor(s): OHRGAARD, Jakob C.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: London : Routledge, March 1999Journal of European Public Policy 6, 1, p. 123-143Abstract: This article is a critical response to an article by Alec Stone Sweet and Wayne Sandholtz in the September 1997 issue of this journal in which they put forward a theory of European integration focused on supranational governance. We argue that this theory fails to address the key problem in current theorizing, namely the persistence of a supranational-intergovernmental dichotomy which dictates that integration is driven by either supranational institutions or national governments. As a result, we argue that supranational governance is essentially a mirror image of the liberal intergovernmentalist theory which it criticizes, and demonstrate that, by reducing integration to a particular form of governance, it fails to allow for different forms of integration in different policy domains. Instead, we propose that the focus of current theorizing on European integration be shifted away from institutional characteristics and toward processes of interaction and policy characteristics.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

This article is a critical response to an article by Alec Stone Sweet and Wayne Sandholtz in the September 1997 issue of this journal in which they put forward a theory of European integration focused on supranational governance. We argue that this theory fails to address the key problem in current theorizing, namely the persistence of a supranational-intergovernmental dichotomy which dictates that integration is driven by either supranational institutions or national governments. As a result, we argue that supranational governance is essentially a mirror image of the liberal intergovernmentalist theory which it criticizes, and demonstrate that, by reducing integration to a particular form of governance, it fails to allow for different forms of integration in different policy domains. Instead, we propose that the focus of current theorizing on European integration be shifted away from institutional characteristics and toward processes of interaction and policy characteristics.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha