La LOLF et la déconcentration
By: MALGORN, Bernadette
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Paris : ENA, 2006Revue Française D'Administration Publique 117, p. 113-116Abstract: The author believes that the implementation of the LOLF is an opportunity to rethink deconcentration, all the more so as it aims at greater responsibility for actors and encourages the use of a certain number of tools, in the sense that over 90 % of state agents work in deconcentrated services. The first condition for such a rethinking is to put in place a system of financial information enabling the localisation of expenses and incomes on a very precise geographical level urban zones and even blocks. This would make it possible to measure the impact of public policies on the territories, and in particular, to avoid paying for the same action several times. Another condition is that of an efficient management dialogue between three levels : the national conception and direction level, the departmental implementation level, and an intermediary level (regional or, in certain fields, zonal) of scheduling, distribution, and evaluation. Regional and zonal prefectures would thus all be designated as responsible for ensuring the function of inter-ministerial territorial evaluation and as relays in the overall management of state modernisation
The author believes that the implementation of the LOLF is an opportunity to rethink deconcentration, all the more so as it aims at greater responsibility for actors and encourages the use of a certain number of tools, in the sense that over 90 % of state agents work in deconcentrated services. The first condition for such a rethinking is to put in place a system of financial information enabling the localisation of expenses and incomes on a very precise geographical level urban zones and even blocks. This would make it possible to measure the impact of public policies on the territories, and in particular, to avoid paying for the same action several times. Another condition is that of an efficient management dialogue between three levels : the national conception and direction level, the departmental implementation level, and an intermediary level (regional or, in certain fields, zonal) of scheduling, distribution, and evaluation. Regional and zonal prefectures would thus all be designated as responsible for ensuring the function of inter-ministerial territorial evaluation and as relays in the overall management of state modernisation
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.