<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Standards of judicial review of administrative bodies :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Standards of judicial review of administrative bodies : The consideration of citizen participation

By: TAUCAR, Christopher Edward.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Toronto : Ipac, mar./mars 2010Subject(s): Participação Social | Legitimidade | Tomada de Decisão | Burocracia | CanadáCanadian Public Administration 53, 1, p. 67-86Abstract: In Canada there is little legitimate or legal room or consistency with the judicial role in judicial review of or appeal from administrative actions or decisions for courts to take into account the degree or quality of citizen participation to support greater deference for administrative decision or action. At most, this consideration may be considered a sub-factor, marginal and never determinative. In particular, citizen participation can be a sub-factor when the public perception is either explicitly central to the legislation in issue, or is assumed or inferred as such by the court. Nevertheless, assuming such citizen participation in bureaucracy is positive, there can be some significant indirect coincidental promotion of it in reality as a result of and through judicial deference to administrative decisions, which occurs concomitantly in standard-of-review analysis
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

In Canada there is little legitimate or legal room or consistency with the judicial role in judicial review of or appeal from administrative actions or decisions for courts to take into account the degree or quality of citizen participation to support greater deference for administrative decision or action. At most, this consideration may be considered a sub-factor, marginal and never determinative. In particular, citizen participation can be a sub-factor when the public perception is either explicitly central to the legislation in issue, or is assumed or inferred as such by the court. Nevertheless, assuming such citizen participation in bureaucracy is positive, there can be some significant indirect coincidental promotion of it in reality as a result of and through judicial deference to administrative decisions, which occurs concomitantly in standard-of-review analysis

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha