<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Judicial review litigation as an incentive to change in local authority public services in England and Wales
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Judicial review litigation as an incentive to change in local authority public services in England and Wales

By: PLATT, Lucinda.
Contributor(s): SUNKIN, Maurice | CALVO, Kerman.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Cary : Oxford University, july 2010Subject(s): Reforma Administrativa | Agente de Mudança | Legislação | Inglaterra | País de GalesJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory - JPART 20, 2, p. i243-i260Abstract: Judicial review is of growing importance to public administration in the United Kingdom but its role in relation to government remains highly contentious. here is much debate over the extend to which it is a threat that imposes costs and impairs service delivery or a positive resource that helps secure improvements in service quality. In this article, we consider the findings of the first comprehensive quantitative study of the relationships between levels of judicial review litigation and the quality of local government services. This findings indicate that judicial review may be making a positive contribution to local government in England and Wales. The article also considers the way local government officials perceive judicial review and argues that reactions to judicial review cannot be wholy understood in terms of incentives. Judicial review makes a positive contribution to public administration and does so at least partly because it promotes values that are central to the ethos of public administration and assists officials in resolving tensions between individual and collective justice that lie at the core of their responsabilities
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Judicial review is of growing importance to public administration in the United Kingdom but its role in relation to government remains highly contentious. here is much debate over the extend to which it is a threat that imposes costs and impairs service delivery or a positive resource that helps secure improvements in service quality. In this article, we consider the findings of the first comprehensive quantitative study of the relationships between levels of judicial review litigation and the quality of local government services. This findings indicate that judicial review may be making a positive contribution to local government in England and Wales. The article also considers the way local government officials perceive judicial review and argues that reactions to judicial review cannot be wholy understood in terms of incentives. Judicial review makes a positive contribution to public administration and does so at least partly because it promotes values that are central to the ethos of public administration and assists officials in resolving tensions between individual and collective justice that lie at the core of their responsabilities

Incentives and Public Service Performance: a special issue

Volume 20

Supplement 2

July 2010

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha