<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria

By: WATT, D. J.
Contributor(s): KAYIS, B | WILLEY, K.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Oxford : Elsevier, jan. 2010Subject(s): Gestão de Contratos | Modelo de Gestão | LicitaçãoInternational Journal of Project Management 28, 1, p. 51-60Abstract: Research in identifying the relative importance of criteria used to select a preferred supplier has, for the most part, relied on subjective lists of criteria being presented to respondents. The research reported here uses an experimental design approach to quantify the importance of nine common criteria used in an actual evaluation and selection of a contractor/supplier. Unique choice sets were constructed, each comprising three tender evaluation outcomes (alternatives) described in terms of all criteria, but with varying levels. Respondents simultaneously evaluated all three alternatives within each choice set and selected the most preferred. Utility estimates for each criterion level were determined as was the overall contribution made by the individual criterion. Results indicate Past Project Performance, Technical Expertise and Cost are the most important criteria in an actual choice of contractor with Organisational Experience, Workload, and Reputation being the least important
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Research in identifying the relative importance of criteria used to select a preferred supplier has, for the most part, relied on subjective lists of criteria being presented to respondents. The research reported here uses an experimental design approach to quantify the importance of nine common criteria used in an actual evaluation and selection of a contractor/supplier. Unique choice sets were constructed, each comprising three tender evaluation outcomes (alternatives) described in terms of all criteria, but with varying levels. Respondents simultaneously evaluated all three alternatives within each choice set and selected the most preferred. Utility estimates for each criterion level were determined as was the overall contribution made by the individual criterion. Results indicate Past Project Performance, Technical Expertise and Cost are the most important criteria in an actual choice of contractor with Organisational Experience, Workload, and Reputation being the least important

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereços:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos - Campus Asa Sul
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
  • Veja a localização no Google Maps
  • Biblioteca Campus Jardim
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 8h às 17h45
  • +55 61 2020-3768 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • Rodovia DF 001, Km 27,4 - SHIS - Lago Sul
  • CEP 71686-900 - Brasília/DF
  • Veja a localização no Google Maps
<

Powered by Koha