<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: The role of government in social security :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The role of government in social security : a comparative analysis between China and the United States

By: DONG, Keyong.
Contributor(s): CUI, Peng.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Armonk : SAGE, dec. 2010Subject(s): Bem Estar Social | Seguridade Social | Análise Comparativa | Estados Unidos | ChinaPublic Performance & Management Review 34, 2, p. 236-250Abstract: This paper compares the social security systems of the People's Republic of China and the United States and analyzes the role of government in a social security system. We focus the comparative analysis on three aspects: concept and content of a social security system, existing social security (welfare) policies, and social security administration and finance. We show that the governments of both countries hold a common ideology about social security systems, including the composition of social security (welfare), social insurance policies, and administration of social security. However, the differences in the social assistance and policy of intergovernmental finances are obvious. These differences make the Chinese social security policy less effective than that of the United States. This finding suggests that the Chinese government should rethink its social security system, adjust its social insurance policy, push for reform of its social assistance system, and strengthen the intergovernmental assistance for future social security.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

This paper compares the social security systems of the People's Republic of China and the United States and analyzes the role of government in a social security system. We focus the comparative analysis on three aspects: concept and content of a social security system, existing social security (welfare) policies, and social security administration and finance. We show that the governments of both countries hold a common ideology about social security systems, including the composition of social security (welfare), social insurance policies, and administration of social security. However, the differences in the social assistance and policy of intergovernmental finances are obvious. These differences make the Chinese social security policy less effective than that of the United States. This finding suggests that the Chinese government should rethink its social security system, adjust its social insurance policy, push for reform of its social assistance system, and strengthen the intergovernmental assistance for future social security.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha