<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Unhealthy competition :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Unhealthy competition : The making of a market for mental health

By: REA, David M.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: UK : Policy Press, apr. 1995Subject(s): ChinaPolicy & Politics 23, 2, p. 141-155Abstract: Markets are said to offer considerable advantages in reducing inefficiencies, in setting priorities, and in promoting innovation and responsiveness to user needs. Market forms of social coordination are therefore being promoted over the bureaucratic forms that have long predominated in health and other welfare services. It is also said that markets are superior to bureaucracy because they do not require external coordination: that they arise spontaneously from (and are more successful because of) the natural propensity of people to compete, bargain and trade. This article, however, demonstrates that market relations have to be created. It examines the adoption of market discourses and the creation of market-like relations in the provision of mental health care. It demonstrates that the anticipated gains from market-like relations are by no means assured. This is because the meaning of markets and the place of competitive or collaborative relationships is uncertain and ambiguous for health care management. The source of these ambiguities is both external and internal and the article offers evidence from each. The service delivery consequences of this situation suggest a greater strategic emphasis on establishing long-term relationships and minimising competition. However, government policy, the limited availability of alternative sources of finance and a discourse of competitive markets may mitigate against this
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Markets are said to offer considerable advantages in reducing inefficiencies, in setting priorities, and in promoting innovation and responsiveness to user needs. Market forms of social coordination are therefore being promoted over the bureaucratic forms that have long predominated in health and other welfare services. It is also said that markets are superior to bureaucracy because they do not require external coordination: that they arise spontaneously from (and are more successful because of) the natural propensity of people to compete, bargain and trade. This article, however, demonstrates that market relations have to be created. It examines the adoption of market discourses and the creation of market-like relations in the provision of mental health care. It demonstrates that the anticipated gains from market-like relations are by no means assured. This is because the meaning of markets and the place of competitive or collaborative relationships is uncertain and ambiguous for health care management. The source of these ambiguities is both external and internal and the article offers evidence from each. The service delivery consequences of this situation suggest a greater strategic emphasis on establishing long-term relationships and minimising competition. However, government policy, the limited availability of alternative sources of finance and a discourse of competitive markets may mitigate against this

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha