<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Determinantes do controle horizontal em parlamentos reativos :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Determinantes do controle horizontal em parlamentos reativos : o caso do Brasil (1988-2005)

By: LEMOS, Leany B.
Contributor(s): Power, Timothy J.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Rio de Janeiro : IESP / UERJ, Abr./Jun. 2013Online resources: Acesso Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais 56, 2, p. 383-412Abstract: Horizontal accountability is a key challenge to new democracies, and especially so in those regimes where “reactive” legislatures face dominant presidents. Although the 1988 Constitution gives impressive legislative and agenda-setting powers to the Brazilian president, it also equips the legislature with a set of oversight tools that can be used to monitor or scrutinize the powerful executive. In analysing a large database of oversight initiatives between 1988 and 2005, we trace broad trends and patterns in the overall usage of oversight tools and attempt to isolate the political and institutional conditions under which they are deployed. We find that the use of oversight mechanisms has risen in recent years; that oversight is mediated by measures of presidential popularity and by the size of the pro-presidential faction in Congress; and that oversight responds to the logic of Brazil’s coalitional politics, driven by the shifting context of the executive-legislative relationship under multiparty presidentialism.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Horizontal accountability is a key challenge to new democracies, and especially so in those regimes where “reactive” legislatures face dominant presidents. Although the 1988 Constitution gives impressive legislative and agenda-setting powers to the Brazilian president, it also equips the legislature with a set of oversight tools that can be used to monitor or scrutinize the powerful executive. In analysing a large database of oversight initiatives between 1988 and 2005, we trace broad trends and patterns in the overall usage of oversight tools and attempt to isolate the political and institutional conditions under which they are deployed. We find that the use of oversight mechanisms has risen in recent years; that oversight is mediated by measures of presidential popularity and by the size of the pro-presidential faction in Congress; and that oversight responds to the logic of Brazil’s coalitional politics, driven by the shifting context of the executive-legislative relationship under multiparty presidentialism.

ISSN 00115258 Versão Impressa

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha