With friends like these : rule-making comment submissions to the securities and exchange commission
By: NIXON, David C
.
Contributor(s): HOWARD, Robert M | DeWITT, Jeff R.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2002Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12, 1, p. 59-76Abstract: Structure and process theorists (McCubbing, Noll, and Weingast, among others), argue that the Administrative Procedures Act establishes a privileged position for the dominant organized interest of an industry in their dealings with regulatory agencies. We examined whether this was indeed the case with respect to the APA-required notice and comment period for rule making at the Securities and Exhange Commission (SEC). Based on an analysis of the commission's own statements regarding comment submissions in 1998, there is little to no evidence that interest that are more institutionally privileged are any more effective in changing the SEC's mind once the agency has proposed a rule
| Item type | Current location | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periódico | Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos | Periódico | Not for loan |
Structure and process theorists (McCubbing, Noll, and Weingast, among others), argue that the Administrative Procedures Act establishes a privileged position for the dominant organized interest of an industry in their dealings with regulatory agencies. We examined whether this was indeed the case with respect to the APA-required notice and comment period for rule making at the Securities and Exhange Commission (SEC). Based on an analysis of the commission's own statements regarding comment submissions in 1998, there is little to no evidence that interest that are more institutionally privileged are any more effective in changing the SEC's mind once the agency has proposed a rule
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.