<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Got SISP? Strategic Information Systems Planning in U.S. State Governments
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Got SISP? Strategic Information Systems Planning in U.S. State Governments

By: HOLLEY, Lyn M.
Contributor(s): DUFNER, Donna | REED, B. J.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2002Public Performance & Management Review 25, 4, p. 398-412Abstract: Data from the Government Performance Project Year 2000 survey of Information Technology in state governments were analysed to determine the status of strategic information systems and technology planning (SISP) in states. Qualitative and quantitative analysis indicate that information technology planning in most states may be more a middle-up than a top-down process. In most states, information technology planning is carried out a the agency rather than the state level, giving planning an operational (nonstrategic) rather than a policy focus. A possible explanation for this operational planning bias is the traditional structural separation in government between strategic policy decision making and technical and operational concerns. There is some support for this explanation in that states receiving top grades for information technology have overcome the separation by forming and empowering independent committees to link state govenment - wide decision making with information technology concerns
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
Periódico Not for loan

Data from the Government Performance Project Year 2000 survey of Information Technology in state governments were analysed to determine the status of strategic information systems and technology planning (SISP) in states. Qualitative and quantitative analysis indicate that information technology planning in most states may be more a middle-up than a top-down process. In most states, information technology planning is carried out a the agency rather than the state level, giving planning an operational (nonstrategic) rather than a policy focus. A possible explanation for this operational planning bias is the traditional structural separation in government between strategic policy decision making and technical and operational concerns. There is some support for this explanation in that states receiving top grades for information technology have overcome the separation by forming and empowering independent committees to link state govenment - wide decision making with information technology concerns

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha