<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Kanji's business scorecard
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Kanji's business scorecard

By: KANJI, Gopal K.
Contributor(s): SÁ, Patricia Moura e.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Oxfordshire : Routledge, January 2002Total Quality Management 13, 1, p. 13-27Abstract: The Ballanced Scorecard was firs devidsed by kaplan and Northon (1992, Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp. 71-79) as a measurement framework that was expected to overcome some of the deficiencies of traditional performance systems. It gives a holistic view of t he organization by simultaneously looking at four important perspectives (financial, customer, internal process, innovation and learning). Apart from being a measurement framework, the Balanced Scorecard achieved recognition as a strategic management system. The new approach to performance measurement suggest in the Balanced Scorecard is consistent with the initiatives under way in many companies: cross-functional integration, continuous improvement, customer-supplier partnerships and team rather than individual accountability. In this sense, it fits well into the quality management philosophy, embracing some of the business excellence principles of Kanji's Business Excellence Model. Nevertheless, the Balanced Scorecard, as presented by Kaplan and Norton, is not without limitations. The causality links suggested among the four perspectives are particularly problematic and ambiguous. Additionally, it fails to recognize explicitly the contributions of important stakeholders, such as employees and suppliers. Taking into account the potentialities and limitations of the traditional Balanced Scorecard, we propose the development of a new framework integrating the elements os Kanji's Business Excellence Model and taking advantage of the strengths of the strenghts of its sound methodological support. The Business Scorecard may be improved by integrating the total quality management principles and critical success factors that consittute kanji's Business Excellence Model. The Kanji's Business Scorecard we present in this paper is not only a conceptual model, but also a measurment model. Furthermore, Kanji's approach has the potential to give a deeper understanding of how achievements in the different areas feed each other to form a cycle of continuous improvement. Finally, the implementation of Kanji's Business Scoreard can help organizations to develop, cascade and implemetn a strategy for business excellence
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
Periódico Not for loan

The Ballanced Scorecard was firs devidsed by kaplan and Northon (1992, Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp. 71-79) as a measurement framework that was expected to overcome some of the deficiencies of traditional performance systems. It gives a holistic view of t he organization by simultaneously looking at four important perspectives (financial, customer, internal process, innovation and learning). Apart from being a measurement framework, the Balanced Scorecard achieved recognition as a strategic management system. The new approach to performance measurement suggest in the Balanced Scorecard is consistent with the initiatives under way in many companies: cross-functional integration, continuous improvement, customer-supplier partnerships and team rather than individual accountability. In this sense, it fits well into the quality management philosophy, embracing some of the business excellence principles of Kanji's Business Excellence Model. Nevertheless, the Balanced Scorecard, as presented by Kaplan and Norton, is not without limitations. The causality links suggested among the four perspectives are particularly problematic and ambiguous. Additionally, it fails to recognize explicitly the contributions of important stakeholders, such as employees and suppliers. Taking into account the potentialities and limitations of the traditional Balanced Scorecard, we propose the development of a new framework integrating the elements os Kanji's Business Excellence Model and taking advantage of the strengths of the strenghts of its sound methodological support. The Business Scorecard may be improved by integrating the total quality management principles and critical success factors that consittute kanji's Business Excellence Model. The Kanji's Business Scorecard we present in this paper is not only a conceptual model, but also a measurment model. Furthermore, Kanji's approach has the potential to give a deeper understanding of how achievements in the different areas feed each other to form a cycle of continuous improvement. Finally, the implementation of Kanji's Business Scoreard can help organizations to develop, cascade and implemetn a strategy for business excellence

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha