<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Stars aren`t stupid, but our methodological training is :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Stars aren`t stupid, but our methodological training is : a comementary on Jeff Gill and Ken meier`s article "public administration research and practice: a methodological manifesto"

By: DeLORENZO, Lisa.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2001Journal of Public Administration 11, 1, p. 139-145Abstract: Jeff Gill and Kenneth J. Meier argue in their J-PART article "Public Administration Research and Practice: a Methodological Manifesto"that there is a crisis in public administration research. Public administration lags woefully behind political science and similar social scientific fields in its methodological sophistication. Part of the problem, they contend, is the misuse of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST); they suggest that NHST be abondoned altogether. They promote other methodological approaches that might be more useful to public administration research. This rejoinder supports their push to use alternative and more sophisticated methods in public administration research and adds that data visualization techniques, including the use of GIS, should be added to their list of valuable techniques. However, NHST testing should not be wholly abandoned because of misuse and ignorance. Instead, it is proposed here that the quality and focus of methodological training in public administration programs be improved and that those who work in the field develop a consensus on just what quantitative basics PA students shoud know
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
Periódico Not for loan

Jeff Gill and Kenneth J. Meier argue in their J-PART article "Public Administration Research and Practice: a Methodological Manifesto"that there is a crisis in public administration research. Public administration lags woefully behind political science and similar social scientific fields in its methodological sophistication. Part of the problem, they contend, is the misuse of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST); they suggest that NHST be abondoned altogether. They promote other methodological approaches that might be more useful to public administration research. This rejoinder supports their push to use alternative and more sophisticated methods in public administration research and adds that data visualization techniques, including the use of GIS, should be added to their list of valuable techniques. However, NHST testing should not be wholly abandoned because of misuse and ignorance. Instead, it is proposed here that the quality and focus of methodological training in public administration programs be improved and that those who work in the field develop a consensus on just what quantitative basics PA students shoud know

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha