<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: New frontiers in alternative dispute resolution
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

New frontiers in alternative dispute resolution

By: MARESCHAL, Patrice M.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: New York : Marcel Dekker, 2002International Journal of Public Administration-IJPA 25, 11, p. 1255-1266Abstract: This symposium brings together seven papers pertaining to alternative dispute resolution (ADR). ADR, denoting non-judicial means of settling disagreements, has become the dominant mechanism for resolving disagreements. Its expansion should continue fueled by the inherent deficiencies of the judicial system and by the changing nature of disputed issues that lend themselves more readily to these types of dispute resolution mechanisms. The first, three papers focus on resolving environmental and natural resource disputes. These include a survey of American environmental lawyers, a case study of the World Commission on Dams, and a methodology aimed at uncovering "win-win" solutions. The fourth paper analyzes the new mediator training program of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, an American governamental agency which is primarily charged with improving labor management relations. The final three papers discuss ADR as a community-based approach to resolving civil and criminal justice cases as well as family disputes. These include two case studies of aboriginal dispute resolution systems (one from Canada and one from the United States), and an empirical comparison of forty-four criminal justice dispute resolution systems throughout the world
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
Periódico Not for loan

This symposium brings together seven papers pertaining to alternative dispute resolution (ADR). ADR, denoting non-judicial means of settling disagreements, has become the dominant mechanism for resolving disagreements. Its expansion should continue fueled by the inherent deficiencies of the judicial system and by the changing nature of disputed issues that lend themselves more readily to these types of dispute resolution mechanisms. The first, three papers focus on resolving environmental and natural resource disputes. These include a survey of American environmental lawyers, a case study of the World Commission on Dams, and a methodology aimed at uncovering "win-win" solutions. The fourth paper analyzes the new mediator training program of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, an American governamental agency which is primarily charged with improving labor management relations. The final three papers discuss ADR as a community-based approach to resolving civil and criminal justice cases as well as family disputes. These include two case studies of aboriginal dispute resolution systems (one from Canada and one from the United States), and an empirical comparison of forty-four criminal justice dispute resolution systems throughout the world

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha