<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Politics, leadership, and experience in designing Ontario`s cabinet
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Politics, leadership, and experience in designing Ontario`s cabinet

By: GLENN, Ted.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2001Canadian Public Administration 44, 2, p. 188-203Abstract: Why are cabinet decision-making systems designed the way they are? Traditional approaches to this question stress the importance of representational imperatives (i.e., region,language and gender), the need for managerial capacity and collegiatlity in complex organizations, or a particular government`s fiscal or policy program. While these approaches have merit, they fail to pay sufficient attention to the fact that cabinet decision-making systems are in the first instance very intimate reflections and extensions of the political instincts, personal atitudes, and governing experience of first ministers. The author sets out to understand recent reforms to Ontario cabinet decision-making in precisely this way - how did Premier Michael Harri`s sense of this government`s mandate, his personal approach to decision -making, and the practical lessons learned over the course of this government`s first mandate influence the design of Ontario`s cabinet decision-making system between 1995 and 1999>? This article begins with a short history of Ontario`s cabinet decision-making system, focusing on the period from 1968 to 1995. It then provides details of reforms introduced between 1995 and 1999 and conclusdes with some throughts on how Pemier Harris` political instincts, personal aptitudes, and governing experience influenced these reforms
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
Periódico Not for loan

Why are cabinet decision-making systems designed the way they are? Traditional approaches to this question stress the importance of representational imperatives (i.e., region,language and gender), the need for managerial capacity and collegiatlity in complex organizations, or a particular government`s fiscal or policy program. While these approaches have merit, they fail to pay sufficient attention to the fact that cabinet decision-making systems are in the first instance very intimate reflections and extensions of the political instincts, personal atitudes, and governing experience of first ministers. The author sets out to understand recent reforms to Ontario cabinet decision-making in precisely this way - how did Premier Michael Harri`s sense of this government`s mandate, his personal approach to decision -making, and the practical lessons learned over the course of this government`s first mandate influence the design of Ontario`s cabinet decision-making system between 1995 and 1999>? This article begins with a short history of Ontario`s cabinet decision-making system, focusing on the period from 1968 to 1995. It then provides details of reforms introduced between 1995 and 1999 and conclusdes with some throughts on how Pemier Harris` political instincts, personal aptitudes, and governing experience influenced these reforms

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha