Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups : roles, tensions and incentives
By: HENDRIKS, Carolyn
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Oxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, March 2002Australian Journal of Public Administration 61, 1, p. 64-75Abstract: There are inherent tensions between traditional, more pluralist forms of public participation and new deliberative democratic processes, such as citizens' juries. There innovative processes, know collectively as citizens' forums. challenge existing roles and power relationships between interest groups and the state. Instead of having key access to the policy stage, interest groups are required to be `bystanders', information providers' and ultimately' process legitimisers'. With such a radical shift in roles and power structure, there are few apparent reasons why interest groups would want to participate in such deliberative processes. In some cases, to the detriment of the process, they decide not to
| Item type | Current location | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periódico | Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos | Periódico | Not for loan |
There are inherent tensions between traditional, more pluralist forms of public participation and new deliberative democratic processes, such as citizens' juries. There innovative processes, know collectively as citizens' forums. challenge existing roles and power relationships between interest groups and the state. Instead of having key access to the policy stage, interest groups are required to be `bystanders', information providers' and ultimately' process legitimisers'. With such a radical shift in roles and power structure, there are few apparent reasons why interest groups would want to participate in such deliberative processes. In some cases, to the detriment of the process, they decide not to
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.