Partisan politics and welfare adjustment : the case of France
By: LEVY, Jonah D.
Material type: ArticlePublisher: April 2001Subject(s): França | Partido de Esquerda | Partido Político | Política Social | Socialismo | Estado e SocidadeJournal of European Public Policy 8, 2, p. 265-285Abstract: This article examine the relationship between partianship and welfare reform in France. France was governed by the right from 1993 to 1997 (Edouard Balladur and Alain Juppe) and has been ruled by the left since June 1997 (Lionel Jospin). Fiscal consolidation and welfare reform have been a central issue, perhaps the central issue, for each of these governments, making it possible to compare strategies across the political spectrum. The article pays particular attention to the ongoing efforts of the Jospin government`s strategy can be distilled into four components: 1)imposing the costs of austerity on the constituents of the right, rather than the left; 2)giving a progressive twist to neo-liberal ideas, such as privatization; 3) targeting tax relief at averange and low-income groups; 4) channelling scarce resources to highly visible, progressive projectsItem type | Current location | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Periódico | Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos | Periódico | Not for loan |
This article examine the relationship between partianship and welfare reform in France. France was governed by the right from 1993 to 1997 (Edouard Balladur and Alain Juppe) and has been ruled by the left since June 1997 (Lionel Jospin). Fiscal consolidation and welfare reform have been a central issue, perhaps the central issue, for each of these governments, making it possible to compare strategies across the political spectrum. The article pays particular attention to the ongoing efforts of the Jospin government`s strategy can be distilled into four components: 1)imposing the costs of austerity on the constituents of the right, rather than the left; 2)giving a progressive twist to neo-liberal ideas, such as privatization; 3) targeting tax relief at averange and low-income groups; 4) channelling scarce resources to highly visible, progressive projects
There are no comments for this item.