<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: The cohesion deficit in Structural Fund policy
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The cohesion deficit in Structural Fund policy

By: RYNCK, Stefaan De.
Contributor(s): McAleavey.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: August 2001Subject(s): Economic and Social Cohesion | Policy structure | Structural Funds | Targeting DisadvantageJournal of European Public Policy 8, 4, p. 541-557Abstract: The Structural Funds of the European Union have proved to be blunt policy instruments in serving their stated purpose of enhancing both economic and social cohesion. Cohesion policy is embedded in a context of intergovernmental bargaining on budgetary allocations which structures the core of the policy around the yardstick of GDP per capita. This complicates the targeting of the funds on real deprivation. Moreover, a pork barrel logic in policy implementation favours better organized and advantage groups within regions. This situation, as well as the growing saliency of inequality issues at EU level, have raised concern with the question of who benefits? from cohesion policy. The European Commision, some member states and local actors are responding by developing efforts to tackle deprivation as expeienced by EU citizens locally. However, they face important constraints in doing so, which raises broader questions about political representation and acess to decision-making in the Union
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
Periódico Not for loan

The Structural Funds of the European Union have proved to be blunt policy instruments in serving their stated purpose of enhancing both economic and social cohesion. Cohesion policy is embedded in a context of intergovernmental bargaining on budgetary allocations which structures the core of the policy around the yardstick of GDP per capita. This complicates the targeting of the funds on real deprivation. Moreover, a pork barrel logic in policy implementation favours better organized and advantage groups within regions. This situation, as well as the growing saliency of inequality issues at EU level, have raised concern with the question of who benefits? from cohesion policy. The European Commision, some member states and local actors are responding by developing efforts to tackle deprivation as expeienced by EU citizens locally. However, they face important constraints in doing so, which raises broader questions about political representation and acess to decision-making in the Union

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha