What happens after the passage of reform initiatives? Two dimensions of social policy reform in Korea
By: LEE, Jooha
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Los Angeles : SAGE, Mar. 2014Subject(s): Implementação | Reforma Administrativa | Tomada de Decisão | CoréiaOnline resources: Acesso | Acesso International Review of Administrative Sciences 80, 1, p. 193-212Abstract: This article aims to present a comprehensive analysis of social policy reform, encompassing its two dimensions, that is, reform decision-making and implementation, with reference to Koreas new social assistance programme. In the social policy reform after the economic crisis of 1997, less was delivered locally than decided centrally. First, there were decision deficits centrally, which became visible locally. This was considerably attributable to the fact that the decision-making process after framework legislation was passed showed more active involvement of conservative forces from above despite the new-found importance of pro-welfare forces from below. Second, there were implementation deficits locally. This article explains the reasons why legislated policy was not implemented as designed in the light of three barriers to implementation. Although a powerful government may be able to steer reform through central decision making, it is not necessarily in control of effective implementation at the local level
This article aims to present a comprehensive analysis of social policy reform, encompassing its two dimensions, that is, reform decision-making and implementation, with reference to Koreas new social assistance programme. In the social policy reform after the economic crisis of 1997, less was delivered locally than decided centrally. First, there were decision deficits centrally, which became visible locally. This was considerably attributable to the fact that the decision-making process after framework legislation was passed showed more active involvement of conservative forces from above despite the new-found importance of pro-welfare forces from below. Second, there were implementation deficits locally. This article explains the reasons why legislated policy was not implemented as designed in the light of three barriers to implementation. Although a powerful government may be able to steer reform through central decision making, it is not necessarily in control of effective implementation at the local level
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.