000			01612naa a2200181uu 4500
001			10109
003			OSt
005			20190211154928.0
008			030116s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aDAVIES, Jonathan S _92741
245	1	0	_aThe governance of urban regeneration : _ba critique of the `governing without government' thesis
260			_c2002
520	3		_aThis paper offers a critique of the concept of governance as networks. Using the complementary concept of regime governance, it argues that networks are not the primary mode of governance in the politics of urban regeneration inthe UK. Drawing on primary and secondary material, it is argued that central Government is becoming more influential in the local policy arena. In the `mix' of market, hierarchy and network, hierarchy is more pervasive than network. It is therefore argued that partnerships should be treated as a distinct mode of governance. These conclusions demonstrate that despite the fashion for copying urban policies from the USA, local politics in the UK remain very different. Ironically, the transfer of policies developed in the USA has tended to entrench divergent practices and outcomes. The UK does not, therefore, appear to be moving toward the US model of regime politics. It is concluded that the partnership and network/regime models of governance should be subjected to rigorous comparative studies
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration an International Quarterly _g80, 2, p. 301-322 _d, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030116 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060606 _b1040^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c10235 _d10235
041			_aeng