000			01986naa a2200193uu 4500
001			10345
003			OSt
005			20190211155016.0
008			030122s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aPECENY, Mark _98219
245	1	0	_aDictatorial peace
260			_cmar.2002
520	3		_aIs there a dictatorial peace that resembles the democratic peace? This paper uses a new data set compiled by Barbara Geddes to examine the conflict behavior of three types of autocratic regimes personalist, military, and single-party dictatorships - in the post-World War II era. We find some evidence that specific types of authoritarian regimes are peaceful toward one another. No two personalist dictators or two military regimes have gone to war with each other since 1945. These dyads were not less dictators or two military regimes have gone to war with each other since 1945. These dyads were not less likely to engage in militarized interstate disputes than were mixed dyads, however. Although single-party regimes were the only homogeneous dyad in this study to have experienced war, multivariate analyse of regimes were the only homogeneous dyad in this study to have experienced war, multivariate analyses of participation in militarized interstate disuputes suggest that single-party states are more peaceful toward one another than are mixed dyads. Thus, while we have found no unambiguous evidence of a dictatorial peace to match the robustness of the democratic peace, there is substantial interesting variation in the conflict behavior of specific types of authoritarian regimes. The analysis presented here demonstrates that studies of the impact of regime type on conflict behavior must work from a more sophisticated conception of authoritarism
700	1		_aBEER, Caroline C _919467
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g96, 1, p. 15-26 _d, mar.2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030122 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060609 _b1530^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c10471 _d10471
041			_aeng