000 | 01488naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 10352 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211155018.0 | ||
008 | 030122s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aCANES-WRONE, Brandice _91778 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aOut of step, out of office : _belectoral accountability and house members' voting |
260 | _cmar.2002 | ||
520 | 3 | _aDoes a typical house member need to worry about the electoral ramifications of his roll-call decisions? We investigate the relationship between incumbents' electoral performance and roll-call support for their party - controlling for district ideology, challenger quality, and campaign spending, among other factors - through a series of tests of the 1956-1996 elections. The tests produce three key findings indicating that members are indeed accountable for their legislative voting. First, in each election, an incumbent receives a lower vote share the more he supports his party. Second, this effect is comparable in size to that of other widely recognized electoral determinants. Third, a member's probability of retaining office decreases as he offers increased support for his party, and this relationship holds for not only marginal, but also safe members | |
700 | 1 |
_aBRADY, David W _91408 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aCOGAN, John f _919471 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAmerican Political Science Review _g96, 1, p. 127-140 _d, mar.2002 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20030122 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
998 |
_a20060609 _b1536^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c10478 _d10478 |
||
041 | _aeng |