000			01649naa a2200193uu 4500
001			10371
003			OSt
005			20190211155022.0
008			030122s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHUDSON, Bob _94967
245	1	0	_aLocalization and partnership in the `new national health service` : _bEngland and scotland compared
260			_c2001
520	3		_aThis article examines some important and interesting differences in the designs of the `New NHS` in England an Scotland in respect of two common guiding imperatives - localization and partnership. In examining the view of key local stakeholders face with introducing the changes, we contrast the generally more flexible and less prescriptive approach in Scotland. In England there was, initially, a reft of guidance from the centre: in Scotland by contrast, there was virutally none. In England the prime bases for localization wil be PCGs and PCTs: in Scotland they will be Local Health Care Co-operatives (LHCCs). The later, like the english PCGs, are to be PG-led; but unlike PCGs, membership is voluntary. Underlying such redesign of the organizational architecture are some important changes in cultures and modes of governance. In particular , we note the rhetoric of a shift, at macro-level, from hierarchies and quasi-markets to networks and the perceived rality of a microlevel shift for individualism to collegiality amongst GPs
700	1		_aHARDY, Brian _919494
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration an International Quarterly _g79, 2, p. 315-335 _d, 2001 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030122 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060609 _b1602^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c10497 _d10497
041			_aeng