000			01749naa a2200193uu 4500
001			10458
003			OSt
005			20220718172321.0
008			030124s2000 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHALL, Thad E. _94534
245	1	0	_aStructures for policy implementation : _ban analysis of national legislation, 1965-1966 and 1993-1994
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJanuary 2000
520	3		_aPublic administration has long considered the administrative agency as the core institution shaping action. But specialists in policy implementation, in particular have suggested that networks spanning multiple organizations may be important phenomena. National legislation from two Congresses is analyzed to determine the kinds of structures explicitly stipulated or encouraged for new of amended programs. The most important questions have to do lated or encouradged for new or amended programs. The most important questions have to do with the extent which single-agency or networked (multiactor) structures are used and the with the extent to which intergovernmental versus intragovernamental programs are prominent. The evidence shows that the great majority of legislation requires multiactor structures spanning governments, sector and/or agencies: intergovernmental programs are especially prominent: and the multiactor character of the structures has remained relatively constant. These findings carry implications for the study and practice of public administration
700	1		_98018 _aO'Toole Jr., Laurence J.
773	0	8	_tAdministration & Society _g31, 6, p. 667-686 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, January 2000 _xISSN 00953997 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030124 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20100805 _b1710^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c10584 _d10584
041			_aeng