000 | 01600naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 10532 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211155102.0 | ||
008 | 030129s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aKENNEDY, Sheila _95503 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aPublic-private partnerships, professional sports teams, and the protection of the public`s interests |
260 | _c2000 | ||
520 | 3 | _aAcross the past 15 years, governments have invested more than $10 billion in the playing facilities used by professional sports teams to produce a set of tangible and intangible benefits. Too often, after making substantial commitments, communities receive new demands for increased subsidies. If these increasing demands are not satisfied, teams frequently move to other cities. Taxpayers and sports fans are then left with unused facilities, debt obligations, and reduced quality of life. If the public sector devotes tax revenues to generate intangible benefits and increased business activity in certain locations, communitis are entitled to adequate safeguards to protect their investment. Various governments have attempted to use different leasedhold provisions to protect their stake in the partnerships developed with teams. These tools and their inadequacies are reviewed. It is then argued that the use of the power of eminent domain is needed to protect the public`s interests | |
700 | 1 |
_aROSENTRAUB, Mark _919591 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tThe American Review of Public Administration _g30, 4, p. 436-459 _d, 2000 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20030129 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20060720 _b1436^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c10658 _d10658 |
||
041 | _aeng |