000			01419naa a2200181uu 4500
001			10539
003			OSt
005			20190211155103.0
008			030129s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSNEIDER, Keith _910137
245	1	0	_aRethinking public administration`s roots in pragmatism : _bthe case of Charles A. Beard
260			_c2000
520	3		_aThis article portrays the pragmatism of Charles S. Peirce, William James, and John Dewey as an insignificant influence during the early years of American public administration. The mainstream thinking during that time was exemplified by the ideas of Charles A. Beard, an influential figure in the early era of the field. Beard`s writings illustrate the way public administration ignored important aspects of pragmatism in favor of practical attitudes and focus on apolitical efficiency. As a result, administrative orthodoxy developed in opposition to pragmatism, which explains the abondonment and misinterpretation of Mary Parker Follett`s ideas. Equiped with the recognition that public administation has never really fiven prgametism a change, scholars and practtioners may be led to consider its possibilities in a contemporary administrative context
773	0	8	_tThe American Review of Public Administration _g30, 2, p. 123-145 _d, 2000 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030129 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060720 _b1500^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c10665 _d10665
041			_aeng