000			01700naa a2200205uu 4500
001			10604
003			OSt
005			20190211155116.0
008			030130s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHUCKFELDT, Robert _94964
245	1	0	_aThe dynamics of collective deliberation in the 1996 Election : _bcampaign effects on Accessibility, certainty, and accuracy
260			_c2000
520	3		_aWe examine the effectiveness of political communication and deliberation among citizens during a presidential election campaign. In order for comunication to be effective, messages conveyed through social interaction must be unambiguous, and the recipient must readily, confidently, and accurately perceive the intent of the sender. We address a number of factors that may influence communication effectiveness: the acessibility and extremity of political preferences, the distribution of preferences in the surrounding environment, disagreement between the senders and receivers of political messages, and the dynamic of the election campaign. The analysis is based on a study of the 1996 campaign, which interviewd citizens and discussion partners between March 1996 and January 1997. The citizens are a random sample of registered voters in the Indianopolis and St. Louis areas, and these registered voters identified the discussion partners as people with whom they discuss either "government, elections, and politics"or "important matters"
700	1		_aSPRAGUE, John _919615
700	1		_aLEVINE, Jeffrey _919616
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g94, 3, p. 641-652 _d, 2000 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030130 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060721 _b1641^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c10730 _d10730
041			_aeng