000			01686naa a2200181uu 4500
001			10800
003			OSt
005			20190211155158.0
008			030205s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_94948 _a HOWLETT, Michael
245	1	0	_aManaging the "hollow state" : _bprocedural policy instruments and modern governance
260			_c2000
520	3		_aModern governments face a paradox in that, theoretically, their bureaucratic capacity for action in terms of knowledge, expertise, budgets and personnel resources is high, while at the same time, phenomena such as globalization and democratization have severely undermined their ability to directly control social outcomes. Recent works by Canadian, Dutch, American, British and French scholars have begun to describe a common set of policy instruments contemporary governmetns now use to indirectly steer social actors towards their preferred policy options. Unlike traditional "substantive" instruments, which directly affect the delivery of goods and services in society, these "procedural" policy instruments are intended to manage state-societal interactions in order to assure general support for government aims and inititatives. Used ib ab ad hoc basis in the past, these tools have becomes an essential feature of modern governance. This article advantages the study of these procedural policy instruments by developing a taxonomy and outlining the rationale for choosing between particular instruments types
773	0	8	_tCanadian Public Administration Publique du Canada _g43, 4, p. 412-431 _d, 2000 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030205 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060727 _b1651^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c10925 _d10925
041			_aeng