000 | 01376naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 10960 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211155238.0 | ||
008 | 030210s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHAANES, Knut _94485 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aLinking intangible resources and competition |
260 | _c2000 | ||
520 | 3 | _aRecent strategy literature that intangible resources - in patticular competencies and relationships - are critical drivers of competitive advantage. However, there seems to be a lack of understanding of when certain types of competencies and relationships are most critical. This paper introduces a framework consisting of three fundamental levels of resource-competition . The framework is illustrated through the pharmaceutical industry. We argue that (1) biotech firms mainly engage in entrepreneurial competition; (2) traditional pharmaceutical firms - here referred to as big-pharma - increasingly undertake contractual competition and, finally (3) generic drug makers compete predominantly operationally. The paper argues that intangible resources contribute differently to competitive advantage depending on level of competition | |
700 | 1 |
_aFJELDSTAD, Oystein _919902 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tEuropean Management Journal _g18, 1, p. 52-62 _d, 2000 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20030210 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20060728 _b1648^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11084 _d11084 |
||
041 | _aeng |