000 | 01660naa a2200253uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 11077 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211155305.0 | ||
008 | 030212s2002 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSCHMIDT, Susanne K _99653 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aThe impact of mutual recognition - inbuilt limits and domestic responses to the single market |
260 | _cDecember 2002 | ||
520 | 3 | _aWhat have been the consequences of integrating the single market via mutual recognition? Did competitive deregulation result? Or were its implications less significant than expected? In this paper I analyse two previously highly regulated service sectors, insurance and road haulage, and study the impact of European policies in Germany and France. I find that the Council instituted mutual recognition in a restrictive way. This limits its impact on member states, which is moreover mediated by national factors. In both sectors, the use of the freedom to provide services has stayed much below expectations. Consequently, the single market rules have primarily resulted in a liberalization of national markets, where this had not already been achieved, for instnace, in Germany. the domestic insurance and road hulage markets have become very competitive, but they remain largely national markets | |
650 | 4 |
_aDomestic Change _919968 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aInsurance _919969 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aLiberation _912525 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aMutual Recognition _912421 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aRoad Haulage _912526 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aSingle Market _917261 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of European Public Policy _g9, 6, p. 935-953 _d, December 2002 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20030212 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
998 |
_a20100622 _b1132^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11201 _d11201 |
||
041 | _aeng |