000			01257naa a2200217uu 4500
001			11211
003			OSt
005			20190211155339.0
008			030217s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aCOLLINS, David _92358
245	1	0	_aRhetoric and reality : _bthe cases of Mazda and Subaru-Isuzu
260			_c2000-2001
520	3		_aWorker empowerment is like motherhood and apple pie: no managment guru over the past 20 years had a bad thing to say about it. But approval is not the same thing as analysis. This paper offers a discussion of the concept of worker empowerment, based particularly on two case studies from the US motor industry. The results of this analysis suggest that empowerment is not a simple and universal idea as most of its supporters allow, and that it may not always be the most appropriate management tool, either. More than that, the inconsistencies inherent in the concept make it virtually inevitable that empowerment will fail
650		4	_aEmpowerment _917153
650		4	_aManagement _916285
650		4	_aMotors Industry _920051
773	0	8	_tHuman Resource Management International Digest _g8, 4, p. 3-4 _d, 2000-2001 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030217 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060801 _b1110^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11335 _d11335
041			_aeng