000 | 01494naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 11309 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211155405.0 | ||
008 | 030219s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aBERENDS, T.C _91046 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aCost plus incentive fee contracting - experiences and structuring |
260 | _cjun.2000 | ||
520 | 3 | _aIn this paper the contractual relationship between owner and /Engineering contractor during the development and implementation of capital investment project is considered. The described Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type provides a mechanism for allocating project cost risk to the owner, being the party best placed to bear the cost risk consequences and providing a performance incentive for the Engineering Contractor, being the party best placed to bear the cost risk consequences and providing a performance incentive for the Engineering Contractor, being the party best place to manage the cost risk. The results of an analysis of eight case studies case studies involving major capital investment projects from the oil and chemicals industry are presented and a quantitative methodology for structuring incentives shemes is described and illustrated | |
650 | 4 |
_aContracting Cost Plus Contracts _920160 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aIncentives Contracts _920161 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Journal of Project Management _g18, 3, p. 165-171 _d, jun.2000 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20030219 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
998 |
_a20060802 _b0858^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11433 _d11433 |
||
041 | _aeng |