000 | 01951naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 11519 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240627173453.0 | ||
008 | 030225s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_916639 _aDurant, Robert F. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aWhither the neoadministrative state? Toward a policy-centered theory of administrative reform |
260 | _cjan. 2000 | ||
520 | 3 | _aThe ascendancy in the United States of new governance reforms (NGRs) poses fundamental challenges and opportunities for public administrationists. The argument in this article is threefold. First, the fundamentals driving these reforms as the twentieth century ends appear enduring and paradoxical in creating a neoadministrative state. Second, because it is more consonant with America's exceptionalist values, the neoadministrative state affords, an opportunity to develop the normative theory of public bureaucracy that has eluded public administration for of public bureaucracy that has eluded paublic administration for so long because of its explicit and implicit penchnat for Hamiltonian rather than Madisonian prescriptions for reform. Finally, and partially to advance the resiliency of that normative theory, I will argue that a polity-centered theory of administrative reeform is needed. Adapted fromt he work of sholars studying comparative state building from a neoinstitutionalist perspective, such a theory can help public administrationists play a distinctive role in both understanding and informing the evolution of the neoadministrative state. A policy-centered theory also can help reframe debates in terms of the ways that NGR reforms affect the relationship between society and the state and away from purely managerialist considerations | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory _g10, 1, p. 79-109 _d, jan. 2000 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20030225 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
998 |
_a20060210 _b0951^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11643 _d11643 |
||
041 | _aeng |