000			01974naa a2200181uu 4500
001			11544
003			OSt
005			20190211155514.0
008			030226s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aO'TOLLE JR, Laurence J _98015
245	1	0	_aResearch on policy implementation : _bassessment and prospect
260			_capr. 2000
520	3		_aWhile policy implementation no longer frames the core question of public policy, some scholars have debated appropriate steps for revitalization. And the practical world stands just as much in need now of valid knowledge about policy implementation as ever. Where has all the policy implementation gone? Or at least all the scholarly signs of it? And why? What has the field accomplished? Should a ressurgence of attention to the subject be exhorted? And if so, in what directions? This article considers these questions a foci on an assessment of the state of the field, and the argument reaches somewhat unconventional conclusions: there is more here than meets the eye. While modest to moderate progress can be noted on a number of fronts, an initial assessment is likely to understate the extent of work underway on matters quite close to the implementation theme. Research on policy implementation-like questions has partially transmogrified. One has to look, sometimes, in unusual places and be informed by a broder logic of intellectual development to make sense of the relevant scholarship. Policy implementation work, in short, continues to bear relevance for important themes of policy and management. But some of the course has shifted, the questions habe broadened, and the agenda has become complicated. Research on implementation, under whatever currently fashionable labels is alive and lively
773	0	8	_tJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory _g10, 2, p. 263-288 _d, apr. 2000 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030226 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060210 _b1538^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11667 _d11667
041			_aeng