000			01894naa a2200181uu 4500
001			11555
003			OSt
005			20190211155517.0
008			030226s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aCLINE, Kurt D _92285
245	1	0	_aDefining the implementation problem : _borganizational management versus cooperation
260			_cjul. 2000
520	3		_aThe purpose of this article is to determine which definition of the implementation problem, organizational management or cooperation, provides the best understanding of the implementation process. In order to do this, I will compare models of the implementation process that use different conceptions of the problem. the models that are used in this analysis are (1) Goggin et al's. communications model of intergovernmental policy implementation (CM) and (2) implementation regime framework (IRF). The CM conceives of the implementation problem as one of organizational management; the IRF conceives of the implementationproblem as achieving cooperation. These models are evaluated using four criteria: the treatment of both the top-down and bottom-up approaches; the role of communication in the implementation process; the level of conflict/cooperation in the implementation process; and applicability to the concept of networks. The results of this analysis reveal that Stocker's IRF, which defines the implementation problem as achieving cooperation, provides a better understanding of the implementation process. The CM, which is based on the organizational management perspective, is much more limited. The implications this analysis has for future research of the implementation process are also discussed
773	0	8	_tJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory _g10, 3, p. 551-571 _d, jul. 2000 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030226 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060210 _b1601^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11678 _d11678
041			_aeng