000			01501naa a2200193uu 4500
001			11600
003			OSt
005			20190211155535.0
008			030228s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMcLEAN, Iain _920367
245	1	0	_aRegulation run mad : _b
260			_c2000
520	3		_aDisasters often involve regulatory failure. Somebody was responsibility for sfety and failed to ensure it, through negligence or lakc of imagiantio, or both. The lost of the Titanic is the UK's best-know and deadliest peacetime disaster. This article revisits the causes of, and inquiry into, the sinking. It illustrates how the disaster was an early example of te kind of injustice and regulatory failure that has often been central in more recent catastrophes. A regulatory body had, in effect, to inquire been central in more recent catastrophes. A regulatory body had, in effect, to inquire into its own shortcomings; therefore too little balme was laid in high places, and to much in low places. The Titanic report scapegoated the captain of another vessel, although the question of his blameworthiness was not read into the inquiry's instructions until after it had heard him. The shipping industry blocked any serious discussion of the disaster in Parliament
700	1		_aJOHNES, Martin _920368
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration : an international quarterly _g78, 4, p. 729-749 _d, 2000 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030228 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060327 _b1050^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11723 _d11723
041			_aeng